Tattoos am Arbeitsplatz – was müssen Arbeitgeber trotz Kleiderordnung erlauben?
Jenny ist Tattooliebhaberin und Unternehmerin aus Leidenschaft. TattooMed heute als veganer Begleiter von Millionen Tätowierten ab Tag 1 bis hin zur dauerhaften Pflege von Tattoos zu sehen ist ihr Antrieb. Als großer Festival Fan findet sie ihren Ausgleich in ihren Reisen in die USA und im Tierschutz.

Tattoos in the workplace - what do employers have to allow despite the dress code?

"How do you want to find such a job?" - Almost every tattoo bearer heard this saying in youth. Fortunately it is Job search with tattoos No problem in the many industries. But: With a good reason, employers in conservative industries can certainly demand that tattoos are hidden or reject applicants due to clearly visible tattoos. How you cut a good figure with tattoos in the interview and in which professional branches you can only act to a limited extent, you will find out here:

Tattoos with the police and in the public service

There are now many exemplary cases in which police applicants have sued in vain because they were eliminated as applicants due to visible tattoos. In fact, the question belongs to Visible tattoos During the interview for the first questions that ask the officials. The reason for the strict attitude is that police officers should always appear neutral. Tattoos could provoke others or a Certain attitude indicate what can lead to dangerous situations in police officers. With large, visible tattoos you have in industries in which you have to appear as a neutral authority, so you have little chance. Small, decorative tattoos or large -scale apolitical motifs on the body are in turn tolerated in many guards.

Tolerant industries: tattoos are not a problem here

Tattoos are no problem in most industries such as gastronomy, in the manual area, in the creative industry and even in the academic field. Whether big or small, whether provocative or purely decorative: Tattooed teachers, waiter and office worker It's everywhere. However, the following also applies here: the more highly the establishment wants to sell, the stricter in most cases the dress code. For example, employers from receptionists, hostesses, flight attendants and employees in the financial sector can demand that they Complete tattoos during working hours by clothing. Here, too, it is not uncommon for the size and the motif. Flight attendants with small flowers on the ankle may be tolerated, is a religious motive to see a skull or a naked pin-up, it looks bad for a permanent setting.

Where is the problem?

One might believe that the few professions in which a neutral appearance is a prerequisite for a job are occupied by scissors who do not personal development grant. A good argument that employers in upscale industries and in public service are repeatedly indicated that tattoos are exactly what: they are an expression of personality and thus something very private. In some people should be called Private strictly separated from work will. This understandable justification may make it easier to understand the conservative point of view of some employers. A neutral appearance is important in these areas

  • Companies on one Corporate identity and also convey them about the appearance of their employees.
  • Professions with direct contact with customers or clients - here it depends on the target group.

With tattoos for the interview

From a legal point of view, employers must not ask about tattoos that are not openly visible in the interview. Nevertheless, you should be your employer No tattoos silencethat could be visible at work. The same applies if you already work in one of the "risk calls" and want to buy a visible tattoo. Motives with political message are particularly problematic - after all, your employer does not necessarily share it and does not want to be associated with your personal attitude to political topics.

In these professions, conspicuous tattoos could be problematic

  • Police: Large tattoos on the neck or on the forearms and lurid motifs are absolutely taboo.
  • Flight attendant: Absolutely well -groomed and neutral appearance is expected from flight attendants. Your tattoos must be hidden here under clothing.
  • Leadership positions, doctors, lawyers: Tattoo is not an exclusion criterion in these professions, but could be an obstacle.
  • Hotels and restaurants in the upscale area: Here, too, tattoos could interfere, but do not have to. It depends on the overall impression!
  • Flight attendant and hostesses: In these professions, an absolutely well -kept appearance is the be -all and end -all. Tattoos are rather undesirable here (exceptions, of course, confirm the rule).
  • Models and actors: If you have already made a name for yourself in the glamor world, you can of course get under your skin what you want. The following applies to normal mortal in the show business: tattoos should be able to be enclosed quickly and easily.

Does the dress code also apply to piercings?

Since piercings can be hidden quickly and easily, many employers expect a piercing -free appearance in the job. Classic earrings are also tolerated or even assumed in upscale industries. Of course, the following also applies here: Less is more. Sightful earrings in a toilet paper shape should not belong to your work outfit if your employer attaches importance to a neutral appearance. Ultimately, it must be decided individually when a tattoo is too much for a job. Last but not least, the decision also depends on personal taste Of your employer. If you are rejected in a company because of a tattoo, try your luck - maybe you just didn't hit your boss's taste in Spe and the next potential employer is simply enthusiastic about you, your tattoos and your work.